<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A life without compromise&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cityfellowship.com/2009/05/a-life-without-compromise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cityfellowship.com/2009/05/a-life-without-compromise/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:45:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ljkim</title>
		<link>http://www.cityfellowship.com/2009/05/a-life-without-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>ljkim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cityfellowship.com/?p=487#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Hey Vincent,

I think we might be talking about slightly different things, but I&#039;m not sure.  What&#039;s the area of complication that makes it &#039;not so simple?&#039;  Anyway, I know you have a meaningful point, I&#039;m just missing it at the moment...help!

Thanks for the text of &quot;Sex and Single Christians&quot; (I haven&#039;t watched the video yet) - I think the topic illustrates what I&#039;m talking about...  Our natural instinct is to try to serve both sex AND God (or God AND money, or God AND career)... But the point of having a Shepherd is He knows what we need.  Instead of giving the Shepherd a place in the sheep&#039;s hierarchy of needs, the wise sheep does well to just follow the shepherd.  So when it comes to Sex and the Single Christian the question is mainly &quot;what does God want concerning unmarried people and sex?&quot;  Unfortunately for those who are unmarried, the Bible pretty much says what you think it says.  But fortunately, I think God does know what He&#039;s talking about when it comes to sex...as well as anything else sheep might need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Vincent,</p>
<p>I think we might be talking about slightly different things, but I&#8217;m not sure.  What&#8217;s the area of complication that makes it &#8216;not so simple?&#8217;  Anyway, I know you have a meaningful point, I&#8217;m just missing it at the moment&#8230;help!</p>
<p>Thanks for the text of &#8220;Sex and Single Christians&#8221; (I haven&#8217;t watched the video yet) &#8211; I think the topic illustrates what I&#8217;m talking about&#8230;  Our natural instinct is to try to serve both sex AND God (or God AND money, or God AND career)&#8230; But the point of having a Shepherd is He knows what we need.  Instead of giving the Shepherd a place in the sheep&#8217;s hierarchy of needs, the wise sheep does well to just follow the shepherd.  So when it comes to Sex and the Single Christian the question is mainly &#8220;what does God want concerning unmarried people and sex?&#8221;  Unfortunately for those who are unmarried, the Bible pretty much says what you think it says.  But fortunately, I think God does know what He&#8217;s talking about when it comes to sex&#8230;as well as anything else sheep might need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.cityfellowship.com/2009/05/a-life-without-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cityfellowship.com/?p=487#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you, but I can&#039;t help but cry, &#039;It&#039;s not that simple.&#039; Some of what you call cultural baggage (although you specifically mentioned the Christian type) seems inextricably interwoven into our existence. Perhaps compromise isn&#039;t the word to describe the solution, but I feel like &#039;something&#039; must be done in order to remain in, but not of the world.

I thought of these two items while reading this blog entry, would love to hear what you think.
http://www.christianity.com/gospelcoalition/Default.aspx?speaker=Keller
(if you can&#039;t listen and respond to the whole thing, I&#039;d love to hear what you have to say about the point starting from the 27:14 mark)

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/note.php?note_id=178676880300
(I&#039;ve taken the liberty of emailing the text to you in the event that you can&#039;t view it due to FB friend permissions)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you, but I can&#8217;t help but cry, &#8216;It&#8217;s not that simple.&#8217; Some of what you call cultural baggage (although you specifically mentioned the Christian type) seems inextricably interwoven into our existence. Perhaps compromise isn&#8217;t the word to describe the solution, but I feel like &#8216;something&#8217; must be done in order to remain in, but not of the world.</p>
<p>I thought of these two items while reading this blog entry, would love to hear what you think.<br />
<a href="http://www.christianity.com/gospelcoalition/Default.aspx?speaker=Keller" rel="nofollow">http://www.christianity.com/gospelcoalition/Default.aspx?speaker=Keller</a><br />
(if you can&#8217;t listen and respond to the whole thing, I&#8217;d love to hear what you have to say about the point starting from the 27:14 mark)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/note.php?note_id=178676880300" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/note.php?note_id=178676880300</a><br />
(I&#8217;ve taken the liberty of emailing the text to you in the event that you can&#8217;t view it due to FB friend permissions)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
